Monthly Archives: July 2016

Appreciating the art of the possible

I stumbled upon this quote by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently: I think a simple rule of business is, if you do the things that are easier first, then you can actually make a lot of progress. This makes so much sense for any enterprise. If you're stuck, try chipping away at the easiest part of a problem. It also strikes me as especially relevant to front office tasks and automation in medical practices. The need to embrace automation, to use technology better, to provide more self-service, etc., is, I think, becoming more understood in practices of all sizes. But that doesn't make the thought of these things any less daunting! Practice managers and physicians may hear "technology" and immediately think, "Oh no, not that again." Visions of EHR implementations that wreaked havoc are vivid and pretty easily recalled. It can be hard to imagine an ROI large enough to make reliving that pain seem worthwhile. But in the front office tech space, many solutions are emerging that are easy to implement -- either wholesale or in parts. And ticking off just one box at a time can give your practice business a boost, even if you're not ready to take on a full-scale automation overhaul. For example, payment portals and email statements have become much easier to implement. Many PMS vendors offer these as built-in tools. Activating these features may (literally) take only a few moments. And if even just one patient finds the convenience encourages him to pay more promptly, the effort you and your team invested will likely be repaid. One of the very best things about how technology for the front office is evolving is that there are more and more targeted solutions to specific, costly problems. You usually don't have to engage in a massive conversion to a new platform to take advantage of any one solution. Chipping away at front office inefficiencies by trying one or more new technologies is a very realistic way to tackle problems that seem very complicated and daunting when taken as a whole.

By |2022-01-01T22:51:55-08:00July 21st, 2016|

Avoiding insurance errors, problems tops the list of medical billing priorities

Capko & Morgan has had the honor of collaborating with the MedData Group on several recent MedData Point surveys. This month, we worked together on one of our favorite subjects: billing and collections. The results may reflect some subtle but interesting changes to recent trends. For the past few years, it has seemed that the dramatic increase in patient payment responsibility was the focus for most practices.  According to this new survey, patient payments are still a very pressing concern for most practices (53%). But this issue was edged out for the top concern by coding errors and other denial causes, which 59% of respondents considered very pressing. We wonder if this is related to narrowing of networks, increasing pre-authorization demands from some payers (mentioned by 49% as a pressing issue), lingering ICD-10 issues, or some combination of the three. Not surprisingly, AR and bad debt are still top-of-mind medical billing problems (49%). We were a bit surprised, though, that preparing for new payment models was only a pressing concern for about a quarter (28%) of respondents. But the CMS is also projecting that most practices will hold off on alternatives to fee-for-service payment, at least for now. Only 25% of respondents put adding or enhancing billing technology on the list of key concerns. We’d love to see more practices take advantage of the growing array of innovative, affordable tools to improve collections from patients and health plans alike. These results seem consistent, though, with what we found in another recent MedData Point survey: practices may not be aware of all the new front office solutions that can make their practices more efficient and profitable. Our consulting group is delighted when we get the opportunity to help practices get more from technology, including systems they've already invested in, especially to improve billing and revenue capture.  Contact us if you'd like to explore how we can help.

By |2022-01-01T22:51:55-08:00July 20th, 2016|

Copays are declining, but that’s not good news

A recent Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker study revealed an interesting finding: average copayments are declining. Their study, which analyzed claims data from Truven MarketScan, found that average copay amounts paid by patients decreased by 26% from 2004 to 2014. Seems like a positive trend for patients and practices ... except that it's not. It's part of a shift that's actually making out-of-pocket costs harder for patients to prepare for and understand. That makes them harder for practices to collect. The Peterson-Kaiser analysis found that while copays declined by 26%, coinsurance increased by much more, 107%.* Payers may be emphasizing coinsurance because it is assumed, like deductibles, to be a more powerful tool to discourage unnecessary utilization of services. But for patients who need care, coinsurance can be another cause of 'surprise' obligations, since it's not always easy to calculate the amounts due. Patients may also easily confuse copays -- which are standard amounts for services like office visits, prescriptions, or the ER -- with coinsurance, which can only be calculated after determining what services are needed. This difference can lead to reluctance to pay, or fear of being incorrectly charged, especially when the amounts are significant. Here's a chart from the Peterson-Kaiser report: Coincidentally, but not surprisingly, the report also found that total cost-sharing continued to rise steadily and steeply. The analysis found that total out-of-pocket costs rose 77% from 2004-2014 -- much faster than wages. Besides the 107% coinsurance increase, deductibles increased 256%(!). For practices, this means that effective patient collections continues to be crucial to profitability. Not only are patients accounting for an ever more significant proportion of earned revenue, their payment responsibility will almost certainly continue to be confusing. It's crucial to help patients understand and prepare for the amounts they will be expected to pay. Be sure you also offer options like credit-card-on-file, mobile payments, payment portal, and payment plans to encourage their compliance. *I also wonder how much of the decline in copayments is due to patients using more preventive services, which carry no copay by law under the ACA. This could bring the average

By |2022-01-01T22:51:55-08:00July 10th, 2016|
Go to Top